![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Navigation
News
|
|
Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 641 (L.4)The Supreme Court Fees (Amendment) Order 2000(The document as of February, 2008) STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS2000 No. 641 (L.4)SUPREME COURT OF ENGLAND AND WALESThe Supreme Court Fees (Amendment) Order 2000
The Lord Chancellor, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by section 130 of the Supreme Court Act 1981[1], sections 414 and 415 of the Insolvency Act 1986[2], and section 128 of the Finance Act 1990[3], with the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Rolls, the President of the Family Division, the Vice-Chancellor and the Treasury under section 130(2) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, and with the sanction of the Treasury under sections 414(1) and 415(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986, makes the following Order: Citation and interpretation 1. - (1) This Order may be cited as the Supreme Court Fees (Amendment) Order 2000. (2) In this Order-
(b) "the appointed day" means the day when sections 1 to 11 of the Access to Justice Act 1999[5] come into force; (c) an article referred to by number alone is a reference to the article so numbered in the 1999 Fees Order; and (d) a fee or column referred to by number means the fee or column so numbered in Schedule 1 to the 1999 Fees Order. Commencement
(b) for the purposes of articles 3, 4 and 8(a), (b), (e) and (f) of this Order on the appointed day; and (c) otherwise, on 25th April 2000. Amendments to the 1999 Fees Order
(e) "Funding Code" means the code approved under section 9 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.". 4.For article 5(1)(b) there shall be substituted-
(ii) funding provided by the LSC for the purposes of the proceedings and for which a certificate has been issued under the Funding Code certifying a decision to fund services for that party.". 5.After article 6 there shall be inserted the following new article-
(b) where the Lord Chancellor, if he had been aware of all the circumstances, would have reduced the fee under article 6, the amount by which the fee would have been reduced shall be refunded; and (c) where the Lord Chancellor, if he had been aware of all the circumstances, would have remitted the fee under article 6, the fee shall be refunded. (2) No refund shall be made under paragraph (1) unless the party who paid the fee applies within 6 months of paying the fee. 6.In column 1 in fee 1, in the notes under the heading "Fees 1.1 and 1.2 Generally", for the note "Fees 1.1 and 1.2 shall not be payable where fee 1.5(b) or fee 6 apply." there shall be substituted the following note-
7.In column 1 in fee 4.1, after the figure "1882(a)" there shall be added the words "or on an application under section 15 of the Bills of Sale Act 1878 for an order that a memorandum of satisfaction be written on a registered copy of the bill".
(b) in column 1 in fee 10.2 after the words "under Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974(a)" there shall be added the following note-
(c) in column 1 in fee 10.3 for the words "an application" there shall be substituted the words "a request";
(This note is not part of the Order) This Order amends the Supreme Court Fees Order 1999 as follows:
- references to legal aid are amended to take account of the establishment of the Legal Services Commission under section 1 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (articles 3, 4, 8(a), (b), (e) and (f)); and - the description of some fees is clarified (articles 6, 7, 8(c) and (d)). Notes: [1] 1981 c. 54.back [2] 1986 c. 45.back [3] 1990 c. 29.back [4] S.I. 1999/687; amended by S.I. 1999/2569.back [5] 1999 c. 22. Sections 1 to 11 come into force on such day as the Lord Chancellor may by order appoint.back [6] 1988 c. 34. Part IV is repealed by Schedule 15 to the Access to Justice Act 1999 (c. 22). The part of Schedule 15 that repeals Part IV comes into force on such day as the Lord Chancellor may by order appoint.back ISBN 0 11 098806 X -- Back --
Stat
|
Other
|